Reclamo contra el embargo comercial. Nueva versión corregida y aumentada. The recent allegation of condemning the U.S. trade embargo introduced by Cuban Foreign Minister to the UN, this is a new version "revised and expanded" from all previous Leaflets were literally dictated by Fidel Castro, to be read by your employee on duty at the international forum.
do not intend to elaborate on details but it is necessary to clarify and refute every bit as contradictory and misleading to use the regime's mouthpiece, to support your claim and to condemn the U.S., as if the only culprit the economic disaster that is today the Caribbean nation.
is an undeniable fact that while Cuba, Castro's decision depended as parasites, of the former USSR and the socialist camp, never had one of its priorities the measures claim to trade with the U.S. approach, however, the History shows that the regime always boycott any attempt to proximity to the northern nation, attempts that were initiated by some presidents who have occupied the White House, but the Cuban response was always, lead to a crisis in retreat, a possible cooling maintaining dialogue and confrontation and tension, as beneficial the ideas and purposes of the tyrant Castro.
in Cuban schools, from the early years of the revolution and guidance of the highest leadership of the government, we tried to instill hatred against the neighboring nation of the North, we are taught as doctrine that the government system United States and its economy as well as habits and customs of that society are like a cancer on humanity and must be wiped off the face of the earth if we are to achieve a better world, that thought is still in force in those who direct policy Cuba.
was in the late 80's and early 90's, coinciding with the demise of the USSR, that the trade embargo, Castro renamed the block would become a politically useful tool for the Castro tyranny hence its mention is constant and repeated across international forum based on these dates and to remain a domestic propaganda campaign External and ideological apparatus of the system permanently.
Misrule certainly has managed to isolate Cuba to the United States in voting to condemn the embargo, which to the satisfaction of Castro et al puts this nation as victimizer and the small island as a heroic victim who resists the boycott of the giant empire , as already noted, the embargo also used by the government of Cuba to justify to his people, throughout the history of disasters of a sinking economy, for its inefficient and fickle address
the embargo keeps alive the historic confrontation with the Castro government, allowing Americans always radicalize even more, the positions of the Cuban dictatorship.
The Cuban foreign minister is very well versed in that strategy, he descends from a privileged former Cuban Communist leader, Carlos Rafael Rodriguez, a member of the old guard, who promptly joined the so-called Revolution, lined up along the tyrant Castro, efforts from the beginning in promoting and maintaining a very close relationship with the USSR, a bond that would make Cuba on the first ally of the communist bloc in this hemisphere and was repeated in those cold war years, with the intention challenging, "in the first trench of the struggle against imperialism in America "
Remitámonos now to the preamble of the Cuban Constitution of 1976 and check the servility that it expresses the Soviet Union when, in the fundamental law of the country, is exalted friendship and brotherhood with mention being made that nation direct and privileged of his name in the constitutional text. In Chapter I, the said document, outlining the basics social policy and the Cuban state, specifically articles, 12 and 13 can be clearly seen, the nature belligerent, intolerant and confrontational of the Cuban regime.
Article 12. The Republic of Cuba endorses the principles of proletarian internationalism and solidarity of the people fighting, and
a) condemns imperialism, promoter and supporter of all forms fascist, colonialist, neo-colonialist and racist, as the main force of aggression and war and the worst enemy of the people;
b) condemns the imperialist intervention, directly or indirectly in the internal or external affairs of any State and therefore, the armed aggression and the economic blockade and other forms of economic coercion and interference, or threat to the integrity of States and its political, economic and cultural rights of nations
c) qualifies as an international crime wars aggression and conquest, recognizes the legitimacy of national liberation wars and armed resistance to aggression and conquest, and considers their right and their internationalist duty to help the abused and the peoples struggling for their liberation
Ch .) recognizes the right of peoples to repel the imperialist and reactionary violence with revolutionary violence and fight with all means at its disposal for the right to freely determine their own destiny ... ...
If spokesman acting chancellor dictatorship was honest, should enlighten the world that seems to have little historical memory, before the demise of the block formed by the European East and Cuba, the trade embargo the United States was more cause for ridicule, that concern for the Cuban Communist Party First Secretary and life, which was dependent to Cuba every day but the former Communist bloc.
These and many other decisions of the Castro regime were not imposed on the people of the island as a result of U.S. policy, as has been claimed to believe, but as part strategy of the young Fidel Castro, turned tyrant and his accomplices, to form a political system that would allow them realize their dreams and achieve perpetual dictatorship in power and in the specific case of Castro, which he never denied that stated in a letter to Celia Sanchez, who was his personal secretary, his great crusade, which consisted of, once achieved absolute power, use Cuba and its noble people as advanced in its direct and personal struggle against the U.S. and around what that country represents an attitude that reflects more the nature of today's elderly psychopathic dictator, his concern for the destiny of the nation he addressed as his property.
But back to the hypocritical claim of Rodriguez, who insists on the grounds of violation of rights and liberties of American citizens when they regulated or prevented from traveling to Cuba, right for so many years has deprived the Cuban without that this "social activist", bother to mention or be able to defend when it comes to citizens of their own country. Very
human is also the concern of the Cuban foreign minister for health of the people and the need for equipment and drugs, highly sensitive issue for everyone, but Mr. Rodriguez also aware, as a member of the upper echelons of government in the island there are different standards and quality medical care that correspond to specific groups of citizens, and for so-called leaders, there are special services of the highest technical and professional level, there are also special clinics for foreigners, who can not access the people, this becomes a reality chimera, the much vaunted health rights and humanism of Cuban political leaders, we remember only one case which by its magnitude, it was revealed the news blackout, the appalling deaths due to neglect and abandonment of more than twenty patients in the Psychiatric Hospital of Havana.
The height of falsehood is when this guy tries to make people believe that, forced and timid measures that the regime applied, are the result of popular will and the desire and the sovereign decision of the Cuban people, then according to Rodriguez, we believe that, left without a job in six months, half a million people who depended solely on state is a desire of the people, half a million citizens who will be soon in the street, with the option of setting up small businesses try to survive on their own activities that were once stigmatized and wiped off the Cuban economy, which are considered harmful the objectives and the Castro-communist doctrine.
I wonder: what is the will and consensus to the regime's official spokesman assumes between Cubans? Of course, to the Cuban dictatorship are not more than two million who walk through the world, bound by a "final exit or a call drop" imposed by a totalitarian state, unable to freely visit our country, for the inhumane immigration regulations of dictatorship and deprived of all rights to participate in national politics. Chancellor intentionally forgot the hundreds of thousands of Cubans on the island have been and continue to be repressed and silenced under threat for political views that are not he and his bosses as rabidly defend?
Could it be that all Cubans have sovereign authority in a nation governed by a single party with a single vision, whose main condition is to keep power in perpetuity?
is simply obscene that the Cuban dictatorship requires the lifting of trade embargo, when Cuba was blocked and so with impunity ignore the rights and freedoms of its citizens.
It is dishonest and devious that undeniable need that manifests the government of Cuba and its Communist Party, money and investments of the much-criticized American society, for they claim to solve the string of economic and social problems facing the island and continue the myth of building socialism than they have over half a century, laying the groundwork.
Cuban Foreign Minister His Excellency, dares to express, in the aftermath of his speech, without the slightest hint of hint of shame, "Cubans may be referring, in freedom, equitable welfare in social consensus and democratic participation of citizens in the decisions of the country. " Such a huge aberration, no doubt, you deserve the applause and recognition of the old dome Castro.
do not think anyone is able to predict exactly what would be the political direction of the island in case of an unconditional lifting of the embargo, but we know that the Cuban dictatorship has always been able to take advantage of the offers unconditional.
understand that democratic countries have every right to assess and express their views on the trade embargo, but when I disappoint their leaders, with disapproval, however, and many agree that calling oversize block, they can not and issue and also approve a resolution for the system of the island lay down their inhumane blockade, the harassment and the fence that have been subjected, for half a century, the freedoms and rights of the Cuban people.
Nelson Núñez Dorta.
PSC Representative in Mexico