World today tells us something that we heard sounds. It is no documentary evidence to support the mobile cards, according to the prosecution's version, were used as timers in the bombs that exploded on trains in Madrid were activated in the house of Morata de Tajuña on the eve of attacks. Also, inform the world, there is no contradiction between the reports on the subject of two police units, ICU and UCIE.
When activating a mobile phone card are recorded some data from the time of activation. What it tells us CGA's article is that no such registration has been provided only for the case of mobile card pack (bag actually) number 13 found in the Vallecas station.
Is that important? What implications can have this information?
Leaving aside the specific content of this information, the analysis of forums let more fans to the dissection of media reports, I think the mere fact that in summer the publication of this article (with the first spades of all media Vacation ), we may suggest that the fine rain of information about contradictions, forgery, concealment of evidence of of the M11 continue in the coming months.
If we look around a few days ago we observed that the prosecutor Zaragoza stated that as there is some evidence that they have little ability to criminality is expected the acquittal of some defendants of the M11.
Ignoring the scandal that is the prosecutor has breached the obligations under their professional status by asking imprisonment without sufficient support of testing, this gives us a clue that is what is awaiting sentencing in circles well informed.
course if the media critics (I prefer this term to the independent directors) with the government continuing its editorial line to take cover with the M11 and the ruling absolving a number of defendants, we have 11M for a while. Which should lead us to ask what should be the medium-term strategy of our civic movement.
course we can not collaborate in the dissemination of information, whether CGA, F. Mugica or other journalists who have investigated or reported the M11 without having been validated in our laboratory. I do not mean a chemistry lab, but a laboratory of ideas. We review all this information and separate the wheat from the chaff. We have seen how the police, once selected the guilty officials turned to trash on them gather evidence to justify processing. Not we do the same, no good demos for everything we throw just because it commits the official version. Verify this information in our lab. Or, better yet, let's start again.
When activating a mobile phone card are recorded some data from the time of activation. What it tells us CGA's article is that no such registration has been provided only for the case of mobile card pack (bag actually) number 13 found in the Vallecas station.
Is that important? What implications can have this information?
Leaving aside the specific content of this information, the analysis of forums let more fans to the dissection of media reports, I think the mere fact that in summer the publication of this article (with the first spades of all media Vacation ), we may suggest that the fine rain of information about contradictions, forgery, concealment of evidence of of the M11 continue in the coming months.
If we look around a few days ago we observed that the prosecutor Zaragoza stated that as there is some evidence that they have little ability to criminality is expected the acquittal of some defendants of the M11.
Ignoring the scandal that is the prosecutor has breached the obligations under their professional status by asking imprisonment without sufficient support of testing, this gives us a clue that is what is awaiting sentencing in circles well informed.
course if the media critics (I prefer this term to the independent directors) with the government continuing its editorial line to take cover with the M11 and the ruling absolving a number of defendants, we have 11M for a while. Which should lead us to ask what should be the medium-term strategy of our civic movement.
course we can not collaborate in the dissemination of information, whether CGA, F. Mugica or other journalists who have investigated or reported the M11 without having been validated in our laboratory. I do not mean a chemistry lab, but a laboratory of ideas. We review all this information and separate the wheat from the chaff. We have seen how the police, once selected the guilty officials turned to trash on them gather evidence to justify processing. Not we do the same, no good demos for everything we throw just because it commits the official version. Verify this information in our lab. Or, better yet, let's start again.
Blog of the black pawns and not so black Banned by Luis del Pino, or at least have a sense of humor. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment