For Vladimiro Roca
In 1997, when I went through the dungeons of Villa Marista I defined it as a counter for one of the many interrogation he was subjected. The interrogator, the more Soroa Clapera, I think called counter trying to irritate or perhaps to get into an argument, but I told him with a question: How do you define? We are revolutionaries, "he replied. Then I am a counterrevolutionary, because I'm against all this, Riposto.
time ago that I define myself from the definitions they use, regardless of whether they are accurate or not.
No, I'm ranting. The above letter has to do with the article title.
Well from the words of Castro on July 26, 1974, published on May 4 on the front page of Granma, I think I'll have to revise it to define me as a counterrevolutionary.
Here are the words of former principal chief " You know that we are entering an intense phase of legality. Revolutions and revolutionary in a phase characterized by destroying all laws, because they were the laws of the oppressors, the exploiters, of the rulers. But along with the habit of removing the law, often working alongside the habit of not respecting any laws. And the revolution means destroying everything old social order and all the old laws governing the life of a society, and replace them with new ones. Which is to say there, we replace the destructive spirit of the old laws, by the spirit of discipline and compliance with new laws.
"Enemies of the old law, and defenses of the new law! That must be the revolutionaries!
"socialist legality is essential and the more we organize and further develop the Revolution, more will be created in the minds of all the people the knowledge of the law and the habit of always respected the law. "
If that is what revolutionaries should do, then it seems that starting with the former principal and all members of the nomenclature are counterrevolutionary, because none of them have never respected the Constitution and laws of the country.
Many discussions with former client on the need to enact additional laws of the Constitution to not remain a dead letter, as happened with 1940, my father cost him a stroke, that decreased ability to work and back away from any party or government job.
Former principal supports not be framed in rules, whether partisan or legal, limiting their will and make it accountable for its decisions and work to organizations or bodies which are considered not to match.
To take one example, and there are many, when the former client, decided to prohibit the entry into the hotels for foreign tourists to Cuba, violated the provisions of section 43 sixth paragraph of the Constitution, which states, referring to the Cubans, who "live in any sector, zone or area of \u200b\u200bthe cities and stay in any hotel;."
If the rulers are the first to break the law, what is then for the people?
daily reminders of excerpts from speeches of the past, only serve to demonstrate the boldness of the gang of outlaws who intends to keep the country outside of any development and prosperity according to their whims, preferences and interests.
also shows how irresponsible they have been and are against its decisions, which of course are those who suffer as they never wanted to respond to those who claim to represent.
If they had shame and be accountable for their actions and decisions that would have given up long ago and had gone away from Cuba, allowing Cubans to fight with all his forces and creativity for their happiness and in pursuit of a better life.
0 comments:
Post a Comment