have submitted letters of qualification. I find it striking the news I read in Digital Freedom regard. Apparently the AVT stated in its final written as LD:
added that the attack did not occur "because of the legitimate decision of the Government" to participate in the Iraq war but was designed "since Spain in its fight against terrorism of any sign," stop with important representatives of Al Qaeda as Imam Eddin Barakat Yarkas, "Abu Dahdah".
"Al Qaeda?
----------------------------------------- I hit the last article of Luis del Pino. Can make any comment freely. COOPERATION NEEDED
5, June 2007 - 10:21:21 - Luis del Pino
Very curious how that leaves the board March 11 after the submission of final written score by the allegations.
Before you say why it is curious, however, allow me a point of law. I do not know anything about laws, but I can not understand why what happened yesterday, the judge authorized the sort of confrontation between one expert translators and others to realize that hallucinated conversations called Mohamed the Egyptian. And yet, kept the term given to the charges for the presentation of his writings, so that more of them they had already submitted before the end confrontation between experts.
is assumed that this confrontation of views on account of the translation of the words of the Egyptian was important, otherwise why do it? And if it was important, if that test depends the greater or lesser culpability of the Egyptian, how is that the judge does not give a new deadline for incorporating allegations in their pleadings the consequences of such evidence can be derived? As I say, I do not understand the laws, and maybe what he has done as Bermudez is normal. But from the standpoint of common sense seems to me absurd. The conclusion I draw from there is that there is a schedule set and fixed, so immutable that can not be postponed by a day or a week the closing of this judicial show. And what I wonder is: who or what make this calendar? Another day return to this subject.
said that the board of 11-M has been in a very curious, because in light of the indictments, it is that we have covered all possibilities:
The Office and the Association of Pilar Manjón hold in their writings 11-M was an Islamist attack and that the defendants are guilty now.
The Association of Victims Support 11-M also claims that the defendants are guilty now, but says the 11-M was the result of cooperation between Islamists and ETA.
The AVT also maintains that the currently processed are guilty, but says it is not behind any terrorist group but a police plot, given the proven presence of informers of the Security Forces among the accused.
Finally, the prosecution of the victims led by Angeles Pedraza argues that this is a plot of false evidence, which would imply that the real culprits of the bombings of the trains are different.
versions, then, for all tastes. The swords are still high and evolve as the track evolves, some of the accusations has covered the flank.
be commended to the accusations that have refused to communicate with the pantomime that is before us. To the charge by noting Angeles Pedraza the falsity of the evidence. The AVT for daring to highlight the political nature of the attacks, putting the finger on the possible existence of a police plot. And the Association of Victims Support 11-M, it is the only charge that directly calls the deduction of testimony from witnesses and officials who have contributed with their lies and manipulations to build the great hoax.
Which brings us to an important issue: what role police informers appear to be implicated in the events? For the prosecution, these confidants (Trashorras, Toro, Zouhier) are necessary collaborators in the slaughter, as it helped provide explosives to used to blow up trains. For those who are convinced of the falsity of the evidence presented to us, these informers have nothing to do with the bombs on the trains, but were also necessary collaborators in disguise, because they would have knowingly participated in the charade designed to conceal the real perpetrators. In any case, necessary cooperators.
And speaking of necessary cooperation, ETA announced this morning that it will kill again, as if he had ever stopped. The Government of Spain has allowed ETA will rearm and reorganize its structure, has purged prosecutors combative with ETA, ETA has legitimized before the European Parliament has taken a bloodthirsty murderers ETA on the street has humiliated the victims, has consented to relegalization batasuno environment and, above all, has contributed to the return of ETA to the municipalities, with the associated access to the budget, municipal services and data neighbors. Nevertheless, or precisely why, ETA will kill again. English society and the Government are cuddly and ETA has seen that can increase the level of extortion.
But when ETA mate, will do with the money that the government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has raised, it will do with the political cover that Zapatero has allowed it to reorganize, it will do with the weapons that Zapatero has allowed agencies will collect data with ETA representatives elected by Zapatero, will meet with the hired killers who legalize Zapatero. José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero
inherited a murderous band in danger of extinction and has been applied bravely to the task of re-set ready to kill, because it suited his game strategy. No home is where Zapatero should go, because we are not talking about well-intentioned mistakes. If ETA kills, where Zapatero has to go to jail.
Cooperation needed, the legal concept is called for someone who has proven essential to return to make available to the murderous bullets of the necks of others.
added that the attack did not occur "because of the legitimate decision of the Government" to participate in the Iraq war but was designed "since Spain in its fight against terrorism of any sign," stop with important representatives of Al Qaeda as Imam Eddin Barakat Yarkas, "Abu Dahdah".
"Al Qaeda?
----------------------------------------- I hit the last article of Luis del Pino. Can make any comment freely. COOPERATION NEEDED
5, June 2007 - 10:21:21 - Luis del Pino
Very curious how that leaves the board March 11 after the submission of final written score by the allegations.
Before you say why it is curious, however, allow me a point of law. I do not know anything about laws, but I can not understand why what happened yesterday, the judge authorized the sort of confrontation between one expert translators and others to realize that hallucinated conversations called Mohamed the Egyptian. And yet, kept the term given to the charges for the presentation of his writings, so that more of them they had already submitted before the end confrontation between experts.
is assumed that this confrontation of views on account of the translation of the words of the Egyptian was important, otherwise why do it? And if it was important, if that test depends the greater or lesser culpability of the Egyptian, how is that the judge does not give a new deadline for incorporating allegations in their pleadings the consequences of such evidence can be derived? As I say, I do not understand the laws, and maybe what he has done as Bermudez is normal. But from the standpoint of common sense seems to me absurd. The conclusion I draw from there is that there is a schedule set and fixed, so immutable that can not be postponed by a day or a week the closing of this judicial show. And what I wonder is: who or what make this calendar? Another day return to this subject.
said that the board of 11-M has been in a very curious, because in light of the indictments, it is that we have covered all possibilities:
The Office and the Association of Pilar Manjón hold in their writings 11-M was an Islamist attack and that the defendants are guilty now.
The Association of Victims Support 11-M also claims that the defendants are guilty now, but says the 11-M was the result of cooperation between Islamists and ETA.
The AVT also maintains that the currently processed are guilty, but says it is not behind any terrorist group but a police plot, given the proven presence of informers of the Security Forces among the accused.
Finally, the prosecution of the victims led by Angeles Pedraza argues that this is a plot of false evidence, which would imply that the real culprits of the bombings of the trains are different.
versions, then, for all tastes. The swords are still high and evolve as the track evolves, some of the accusations has covered the flank.
be commended to the accusations that have refused to communicate with the pantomime that is before us. To the charge by noting Angeles Pedraza the falsity of the evidence. The AVT for daring to highlight the political nature of the attacks, putting the finger on the possible existence of a police plot. And the Association of Victims Support 11-M, it is the only charge that directly calls the deduction of testimony from witnesses and officials who have contributed with their lies and manipulations to build the great hoax.
Which brings us to an important issue: what role police informers appear to be implicated in the events? For the prosecution, these confidants (Trashorras, Toro, Zouhier) are necessary collaborators in the slaughter, as it helped provide explosives to used to blow up trains. For those who are convinced of the falsity of the evidence presented to us, these informers have nothing to do with the bombs on the trains, but were also necessary collaborators in disguise, because they would have knowingly participated in the charade designed to conceal the real perpetrators. In any case, necessary cooperators.
And speaking of necessary cooperation, ETA announced this morning that it will kill again, as if he had ever stopped. The Government of Spain has allowed ETA will rearm and reorganize its structure, has purged prosecutors combative with ETA, ETA has legitimized before the European Parliament has taken a bloodthirsty murderers ETA on the street has humiliated the victims, has consented to relegalization batasuno environment and, above all, has contributed to the return of ETA to the municipalities, with the associated access to the budget, municipal services and data neighbors. Nevertheless, or precisely why, ETA will kill again. English society and the Government are cuddly and ETA has seen that can increase the level of extortion.
But when ETA mate, will do with the money that the government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has raised, it will do with the political cover that Zapatero has allowed it to reorganize, it will do with the weapons that Zapatero has allowed agencies will collect data with ETA representatives elected by Zapatero, will meet with the hired killers who legalize Zapatero. José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero
inherited a murderous band in danger of extinction and has been applied bravely to the task of re-set ready to kill, because it suited his game strategy. No home is where Zapatero should go, because we are not talking about well-intentioned mistakes. If ETA kills, where Zapatero has to go to jail.
Cooperation needed, the legal concept is called for someone who has proven essential to return to make available to the murderous bullets of the necks of others.
The blog of the black pawns and not so black Banned by Luis del Pino, or at least have a sense of humor. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment