comment in another forum, to paraphrase my friend Procyon, in the most significantly 11M confusion. Confusion at all levels. I usually do often also the comment " 11M in nothing is as it seems."
Everything I say this because I can not understand the position of the private prosecution lawyers engaged in the AVT. I believed until now that the prosecution of the AVT "wanted to know the truth" and that was the reason that people in the process. AVT's support our merger until February 2007 and the incorporation of the theme want to know the truth 11M demonstrations in the streets of Madrid, and the comments in the media Alcaraz, Moris and my dear Pepe Marco made me think that the position of the AVT on this issue substantially coincided with ours.
But it appears that the AVT in his response to requests zillion thousand years in prison for the main accused. The Leader Pawn said today that in some writings of qualification is requested testimony deduced from a number of officials including the EOD is that both have given us to speak and whose negligent or criminal act has earned so much money to some commentators that have forrao discussing their adventures.
So where does that leave us? There are some officials who have falsified evidence and therefore they are not valid and can not be condemned, or has been proven that the accused are guilty because of the Pueba provided by the police.
This perplexity which I find myself for days passed and I was not far from it increases with the Leader article.
I can only think that this is to cover two objectives, namely truth and gain compensation for their clients. Could be and I would be legitimate but I do not see a Zougham compensating anyone for that would be necessary to ask the liability of the State. And at this point where I'm used to, in the hazard of my zero knowledge adecuadamentes process to assess these possibilities.
What if he does not know that gets?
Well, about this whole world opinion in favor and against, even people who know even less, even live on that. So I pointed to the view tambiénme.
If someone comes up with some plausible explanation, I would appreciate I the comment. ---------------------
have told me
He says people told that LDP has given instructions that no rallies in cities where no have some assurance of success, there will be time to mobilize. The same is for this reason that on their official website is the list of cities from the concentration of May. -----------------
sincerely believe that the more reasonable position before the flood tide of confusion is ours 11M: 11M : We want to know the whole truth . Ask us if we leave the truth of 11M chips fall in the usual sites. Huesca, Navarra square. Zaragoza. Paradise by the monument sq. to the constitution.
Everything I say this because I can not understand the position of the private prosecution lawyers engaged in the AVT. I believed until now that the prosecution of the AVT "wanted to know the truth" and that was the reason that people in the process. AVT's support our merger until February 2007 and the incorporation of the theme want to know the truth 11M demonstrations in the streets of Madrid, and the comments in the media Alcaraz, Moris and my dear Pepe Marco made me think that the position of the AVT on this issue substantially coincided with ours.
But it appears that the AVT in his response to requests zillion thousand years in prison for the main accused. The Leader Pawn said today that in some writings of qualification is requested testimony deduced from a number of officials including the EOD is that both have given us to speak and whose negligent or criminal act has earned so much money to some commentators that have forrao discussing their adventures.
So where does that leave us? There are some officials who have falsified evidence and therefore they are not valid and can not be condemned, or has been proven that the accused are guilty because of the Pueba provided by the police.
This perplexity which I find myself for days passed and I was not far from it increases with the Leader article.
I can only think that this is to cover two objectives, namely truth and gain compensation for their clients. Could be and I would be legitimate but I do not see a Zougham compensating anyone for that would be necessary to ask the liability of the State. And at this point where I'm used to, in the hazard of my zero knowledge adecuadamentes process to assess these possibilities.
What if he does not know that gets?
Well, about this whole world opinion in favor and against, even people who know even less, even live on that. So I pointed to the view tambiénme.
If someone comes up with some plausible explanation, I would appreciate I the comment. ---------------------
have told me
He says people told that LDP has given instructions that no rallies in cities where no have some assurance of success, there will be time to mobilize. The same is for this reason that on their official website is the list of cities from the concentration of May. -----------------
sincerely believe that the more reasonable position before the flood tide of confusion is ours 11M: 11M : We want to know the whole truth . Ask us if we leave the truth of 11M chips fall in the usual sites. Huesca, Navarra square. Zaragoza. Paradise by the monument sq. to the constitution.
Blog of the black pawns and not so black Banned by Luis del Pino, or at least have a sense of humor. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment