The government's propaganda speech Felipe Calderon has sustained its war against narco " and seeking to avoid their historic responsibility for the disaster that has led the country, trying to blame the violence that has destroyed in Mexico in the last four years to the forces of evil
called organized crimehas failed utterly PAN and only seem to be unaware of it.
1. The execution of seven people, mostly young people, among them the poet's son Javier Sicily, on 28 March in the vicinity of Cuernavaca, has been a turning point in the attitude of Mexicans before that happens, it has filled large sections that had hitherto remained passive against the depredations of the country conducted by the Calderón government, and are already adding to the more aware of people saying, by all means his weariness with the policies that the PAN government in Mexico has been sinking so far of this administration and do not hesitate any criminal qualify
.
2. images of various television news on Wednesday, April 6 after the demonstrations that took place in Cuernavaca and other cities left no doubt because of popular feeling, as with their banners, the audience shouted that
go , Calderón Out!
and the murderers are in Los Pinos
, although several of the media tried to present the demonstrations as a demand the government to intensify their repressive policies, or seeking to blame the crime on the PAN governor Marco Antonio Adame, angered by the leaking of information in which the state prosecutor had argued that the military would be responsible for the murder of Juan Francisco Sicily and peers.
3. The executions Cuernavaca thus have to discuss again the central question of what happens: where is the boundary that distinguishes the actions of the armed forces
State and U.S. agencies, which are acting in violation of the law continued to intimidate the people and defend certain interests of narco associated
politicians and financial officer, and the armed forces of other cartels?
4. The militarization of Mexico or "war on narco " imposed on the government of Felipe Calderón by Washington in return for supporting you in the fraudulent election of 2006, we know that from the outset sought to create a scene of chaos and intimidation, United States that would allow more direct control of the Mexican state apparatus on the pretext of ensuring the internal security
, but in reality to take over our resources strategic and political power usufruct PAN benefit several mafia groups, and therefore the alleged
war was based on a Manichean discourse and a liar who tried that was being waged between the forces
of good and evil
. That is, the same speech that Washington has allowed, in Afghanistan and Iraq to Libya, to pursue economic goals, one of which is certainly the sort of market for the benefit of drug trafficking.
5. review of some of the most horrific episodes of this administration shows that most of them it was not massacres by " cartels," said as the official version logic
good and bad
, but for crimes committed by state security forces for several reasons: the policy of intimidating young people and marginalized sectors, collusion of sectors such official security forces with groups of narco , their indiscriminate and uncontrolled poorly trained staff, errors. In sum, the fascism of the Colombian government forces.
6. And here another question arises: what are the interests of political elites U.S. financial and in business? The American actor Edward James Olmos, a Mexican who came to Cuernavaca to sympathize with the poet Javier Sicilia and the movement of repudiation of government policies, had serious problems in an interview on Wednesday, 6 to explain why the United States, is a major producer and biggest consumer of drugs in the world, no U.S. agencies fighting the cartels as they do in Mexico and no one accuses the White House to have an understanding with organized crime
. Nor are policies of "war on narco " in Russia, France, Turkey or Spain, or even occupied Afghanistan in the Pentagon, where cartels operate freely.
7. popular resistance has to face a growing challenge, because U.S. policies are far from moderate increasingly aggressive, as many do not realize, and submission of the PAN government (and the PRI) is absolute. Admiral James Winnefeld (Northern Command chief) said on Tuesday 5 to the U.S. Congress that the government of Felipe Calderón to take their "war on narco " to the southern border, which was repeated on the same day in Cancun Michele Leonhart (director of the DEA) at the 28 International Conference on Drugs, and no one refuted this argument from the government.
8. responsibility of Calderon and the PAN in this
war, not against the narco but against Mexico, shares a fundamental way the PRI, which endorsed the appointment as the new prosecutor of the Republic of attorney Marisela Morales Ibanez, who has shown dishonesty and lack of preparedness for office, and whose appointment announced that they will only serve as a puppet of U.S. agencies. Humberto Moreira, new president of the PRI, was bully in public but snipe at Calderon and the United States, and must accept its responsibility in the blind violence that prevails in the country and the fact that the federal chambers do not constitute a counterweight to the policies of the PAN, much less an instance of defense of national sovereignty.
9. The fact control more directly to the PGR will not stop to Washington to exert increasing pressure against the weak Mexican government. Robert Mueller, FBI director, said on 6 before a subcommittee of the House of Representatives that the violence in Mexico has reached unprecedented levels
, which recognized are higher than in the years of the Mexican Revolution, which, he insisted, a threat to United States (ignoring, of course, the responsibility of Washington on it), and urged extreme current policies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment